Future LNG Regasification Terminals (2026–2035): 230 MTPA

19 August 2026
Capacity balance: Regasification vs Liquefaction — 2.1× → 0.9×. Why?
2025: Liquefaction capacity 525 MTPA vs regasification capacity 1,114 MTPA — 2.1×
Future additions: Liquefaction capacity 250 MTPA vs regasification capacity 230 MTPA — 0.9×
Projects: 94 MTPA | 25 projects
Under construction: 64 MTPA — 14 projects
Advanced pre-FID: 25 MTPA — 8 projects
Early-stage concepts: 5+ MTPA — 3 projects
Innovations
Phased terminal development
Shared port and pipeline infrastructure
Multi-molecule energy hubs
Offshore and jettyless LNG transfer systems
Onshore or FSRU?
Market — baseload, seasonal or peak gas demand
Capacity — required send-out and gas-grid limitations
Storage — cargo size, delivery frequency and supply buffer
Site conditions — metocean, water depth, dredging and land availability
Schedule and commercial model — permanent CAPEX or charter-based fast-track deployment
I. Under construction — 64 MTPA
🇨🇳 2026: Sinopec Longkou — 5.0 MTPA, 880K m³
🇮🇶 2027: Khor Al Zubair — 3.8 MTPA, 170K m³ (FSRU)
🇩🇪 2027: Brunsbüttel Permanent Terminal — 5.9 MTPA, 330K m³
🇰🇷 2027: KOGAS Dangjin — 6.0 MTPA, 1.08M m³
🇦🇺 2027: Port Kembla — 2.4 MTPA (FSRU)
🇧🇸 2027: New Providence LNG Terminal — Jettyless floating terminal
🇨🇴 2027: Puerto Bahía — 2.3 MTPA (jettyless FSRU)
🇮🇳 2028: Gopalpur — 5.0 MTPA
🇵🇱 2028: Gdańsk FSRU 1 — 4.5 MTPA, 170K m³
🇩🇪 2029: Hanseatic Energy Hub, Stade — 9.8 MTPA, 480K m³
🇹🇼 2029: Mailiao — 3.0 MTPA, 320K m³
🇹🇭 2029: Map Ta Phut Phase 3 — 8.0 MTPA
🇹🇼 2030: Kaohsiung Intercontinental — 6.0 MTPA, 720K m³
🇨🇾 Vasilikos LNG Terminal — 2.0 MTPA (floating terminal redevelopment)
II. Advanced pre-FID — 25 MTPA
🇮🇳 2027–2028: Haldia — 1.5 MTPA (floating terminal)
🇳🇱 2028: EemsEnergyTerminal Extension — 6.3 MTPA (floating terminal)
🇿🇦 2028 (FID): Zululand Energy Terminal, Richards Bay — 2.0 MTPA, ≥135K m³ (FSU + onshore regasification)
🇦🇺 2028–2029: Viva Energy Geelong — 3.0 MTPA, 160K–180K m³ (FSRU)
🇳🇱 2029: Zeeland Energy Terminal — 5.5 MTPA, ≥180K m³ (FSRU)
🇵🇱 2031–2032: Gdańsk FSRU 2 — 3.3 MTPA
🇿🇦 2035: Port of Ngqura — 3.6 MTPA
🇳🇿 Port Taranaki LNG — Floating terminal
III. Early-stage concepts
🇱🇰 Sri Lanka LNG Import Terminal, Kerawalapitiya — Floating terminal
🇧🇩 Bangladesh Third FSRU, Moheshkhali — 4.5 MTPA
🇲🇦 Nador West Med — 3.8 MTPA, ≥160K m³ (FSRU concept; on hold)
Methodology
“Under construction” includes construction, commissioning, terminal redevelopment and final FSRU deployment. “Advanced pre-FID” includes pre-FEED, FEED, permitting, conditional FID, procurement and commercial development. “Early-stage” covers feasibility and initial development concepts.
Years indicate expected start-up unless marked FID. Projects without a reliably disclosed schedule are listed without a year.
The list includes projects with sufficient public information on development status, schedule or capacity. Undisclosed and on-hold capacity is excluded from the MTPA totals.
Installed liquefaction and regasification capacities follow the IGU World LNG Report. Future additions use the IEA Global LNG Capacity Tracker for liquefaction and the IGU project pipeline for regasification.
Units: Regasification capacity is expressed in MTPA and LNG storage in m³ (K = thousand; M = million). For indicative conversion, 1 MTPA ≈ 133 MMscf/d; therefore, 4.5 MTPA ≈ 600 MMscf/d.
Sources
International Gas Union — World LNG Report
International Energy Agency — Global LNG Capacity Tracker
GIIGNL — Annual Reports
National energy ministries and port authorities
Terminal developers, FSRU owners and project operators
Regulatory filings, procurement notices and company announcements
Publicly available project information as of August 2026
Industry feedback, additional public data and corrections are welcome.
For LNG Regasification Capacity History (1964–2025), please refer to:
© Alexei Bykov / REBDUK | www.rebduk.com — Original research and analysis. Feel free to reference or share — we would just appreciate a credit and a link back to the original article
































Comments